The American withdrawal from Iraq could be a deadly instance of history repeating itself: a letter to the editor of the Economist magazine (not published)
The recent Baker-Hamilton Iraq study group report is optimistic in its recommendations for withdrawal of nearly all American troops by early 2008. It seeks to use this deadline as a bolster that will motivate the Iraqi government to step up their efforts to take over the counties security responsibility. However, following the recommendations as stated could cause the United States to come frighteningly close to repeating history.
A premature departure from the conflict will likely have the same result as the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989. Firstly, the Soviets left an incredibly volatile country that erupted into several years of debilitating civil war due to sectarian violence, warlords and a rag-tag collection of left over Arab insurgents. The result of this is well known- a perfect breeding ground for radical Islamic ideology and terrorist training camps. The second potential parallel is that Soviet withdrawal was trumpeted as a great defeat of an infidel superpower by the Mujahideen insurgents. This defeat greatly emboldened their cause, giving them much greater clout and support for operations against the next superpower they were to topple. If the region falls into chaos and another sectarian civil war, Osama bin Laden and his supporters and followers will inevitably see it as a sign of the righteousness of their cause, which will in turn solidify a much more substantial support base from the hundreds of thousands of Muslims that are on the fence about the Islamic radical’s strategy and ideology.
A change in policy is certainly needed, but if the recommendations for a 2008 withdrawal of forces are to be implemented, the government must be sure that the Iraqi forces will be able to take over, or else the recent history of the American-Middle East conflict will be played over again.